Use Of Phonetic Redundancy In Literature
Keywords:
phonetic redundancy, literature, phonostylistics, alliteration, assonance, phonemic repetition, poetic sound patterns, rhythm in literature.Abstract
This article focuses on the nature of phonetic redundancy and its literary functions, with the concept of redundancy first developing out of linguistic theory but being an integral part of the stylistic construction of literary discourse. As redundancy relates to its usual definition of unnecessary sequences of repeated material, the process of phonetic redundancy within the literary context could serve the purpose of rhythmic consistency, the reinforcement of meaning with the addition of stronger emotions due to the sound patterns provided by the text, or the creation of images through the development of particular sounds. The study of this phenomenon through the use of canonical English literary works of the great playwright William Shakespeare and later the great writers Edgar Allan Poe and Robert Frost, along with the works of modern literary writers who make extensive use of this method of redundancy based on sound patterns, argues that this redundancy is an intrinsic part of the construction of the artistic experience surrounding the literary text.
References
Abrams, M. H. (1999). A glossary of literary terms (7th ed.). Heinle & Heinle.
Attridge, D. (1995). Poetic rhythm: An introduction. Cambridge University Press.
Bradbury, R. (1951). The illustrated man. Doubleday.
Bradbury, R. (1957). Dandelion wine. Doubleday.
Bussmann, H. (2006). Routledge dictionary of language and linguistics. Routledge.
Coleridge, S. T. (1798). The rime of the ancient mariner. In Lyrical ballads. J. & A. Arch.
Crystal, D. (2009). Dictionary of linguistics and phonetics (6th ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
Dawson, J. H. (1992). Avoid redundancy in writing. Weed Technology, 6(4), 782.
Dickens, C. (1859). A tale of two cities. Chapman & Hall.
Fabb, N., & Halle, M. (2008). Meter in poetry: A new theory. Cambridge University Press.
Hemingway, E. (1929). A farewell to arms. Scribner.
Jakobson, R. (1960). Linguistics and poetics. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp. 350–377). MIT Press.
Keats, J. (1819). To autumn. In Lamia, Isabella, The Eve of St Agnes, and other poems. Taylor and Hessey.
Lawrence, D. H. (1920). Women in love. Martin Secker.
Leech, G. N. (1969). A linguistic guide to English poetry. Longman.
Lotman, Y. M. (1977). The structure of the artistic text (R. Vroon, Trans.). University of Michigan Press. (Original work published 1970)
Lynch, M. (2021, April 7). The differences between a phone, phoneme and an allophone. The Edvocate.
O’Grady, W. (2005). Contemporary linguistics: An introduction (5th ed.). Bedford/St. Martin’s.
Owen, W. (1920). Poems. Chatto & Windus.
Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct: How the mind creates language. William Morrow.
Poe, E. A. (1845). The raven. New York Evening Mirror.
Shakespeare, W. (1606). Macbeth. London.
Shakespeare, W. (1609). Sonnets. Thomas Thorpe.
Shakespeare, W. (1611). The tempest. London.
Tennyson, A. (1842). Break, break, break. In Poems. Moxon.
Tsur, R. (1992). What makes sound patterns expressive? The poetic mode of speech perception. Duke University Press.
Twain, M. (1884). The adventures of Huckleberry Finn. Charles L. Webster.
Waugh, L. R. (1982). Marked and unmarked: A choice between unequals in semiotic structure. Semiotica, 39(3–4), 299–318.
Sulaymonovna, Q. N., & Shavkatovna, A. M. (2024). UNDERSTANDING THE CONCEPT OF EVALUATION: A MULTIDISCIPLINARY EXPLORATION. INTELLECTUAL EDUCATION TECHNOLOGICAL SOLUTIONS AND INNOVATIVE DIGITAL TOOLS, 3(28), 192-194.
Qobilova, N., & Hojiyeva, M. (2023). UMUMIY TAQIQLOVCHILAR VA ULARNING KOMPONENTLARI. Farg'ona davlat universiteti, (1), 165-165.
Qobilova, N., & Hojiyeva, M. (2023). UMUMIY TAQIQLOVCHILAR VA ULARNING KOMPONENTLARI. Farg'ona davlat universiteti, (1), 165-165.
Kobilova, N. S. (2020). IN THE LIFE OF THE AUTHOR AND THE HERO OF THE WORK SIMILARITIES. Theoretical & Applied Science, (6), 250-252.
Akhrorovna, N. N., & Kizi, B. S. N. (2024). METHODS OF TEACHING ENGLISH TO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL LEARNERS. SUSTAINABILITY OF EDUCATION, SOCIO-ECONOMIC SCIENCE THEORY, 2(17), 163-168.
Akhrorovna, N. N., & Khamidullayevna, K. S. (2024). BENEFITS OF STUDYING FOREIGN LANGUAGES. PEDAGOGICAL SCIENCES AND TEACHING METHODS, 3(32), 55-59.
Akhrorovna, N. N. (2024). ENHANCING LANGUAGE TEACHING AND CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT THROUGH INTERACTIVE PEDAGOGICAL PRACTICES. PEDAGOGICAL SCIENCES AND TEACHING METHODS, 3(32), 50-54.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Both journal and authors

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



