logo

The Problem Of Models Of Discourse In Linguistics

Authors

  • Shakhnoza Akramovna Kuldasheva

    Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) Associate-Professor, UzSWLU, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
    Author
  • Vazira Rustamovna Ochilova

    Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) Associate-Professor, UzSWLU, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
    Author

Keywords:

discourse, text, verbal communication, pragmatics, culture, context, explication, proposition, presupposition.

Abstract

The present article discusses the issue of nomination and categorization of meanings manifested in the in discourse. In world linguistics, the basis of discourse theory is the study of linguistic phenomena and their formal aspects. From this point of view of semiotics, the necessity of studying the phenomenon from the linguacultural point of view is closely related to the growing interest to analyzing the interdisciplinary connection of the existing paradigm of modern knowledge, within the framework of which it determines the consideration of discourse, which is the first aspect of the linguistic phenomenon, on the basis of its connection with such branches of sciences as logic, psychology, sociology. The essence of discourse is based on the idea that home-eloquent of people speaking different languages have a different national, linguistic or cultural picture of the world, existence, based on the structural and functional capabilities of their language. This idea, put forward by W. von Humboldt, was later enthusiastically supported by the majority of the contemporary and preceding linguists and research was conducted using different languages as examples. However, linguists who have studied this theory practically used world languages as examples and they have tried and continue to try to verify whether this idea is correct or incorrect only through the example of language vocabulary composition.

References

Dijk T.A. van. Studies in the pragmatics of discourse. The Haque. - Paris: Mouton: 1981, - 331pp.

Harris Z. Discourse Analysis. // Language. - Vol. 28, No. 1 - 1952. - pp. 1-30.

Qo‘ldashev A.M. Tilni egallashda lisoniy va madaniy dunyoqarashning roli. NamDU Ilmiy Axborotnomasi. – 2024. - 4-son. - 704-706 bb.

Qo‘ldasheva Sh. A. Tilshunoslik sohalari orasida lingvokulturologiyaning tutgan o’rni. NamDU Ilmiy Axborotnomasi. – 2025. - 2-son. - 426-428 bb.

Демьянков В.З. Функционализм в зарубежной лингвистике конца ХХ века. / В кн.: Дискурс, речь, речевая деятельность, - М: РАН, ИНИОН, 2000. - С. 26-136.

Ochilova V.R. Talabalarga ingliz tilidagi leksik birliklarni metakognitiv yondashuv asosida o‘rgatish. (Monografiya) – Toshkent: “BAYOZ”, 2023. – 120 bet.

Степанов, Ю.С. Альтернативный мир, Дискурс, Факт и принцип Причинности / Ю.С. Степанов. – Москва // Язык и наука конца XX века: сборник статей / Ред. Ю.С. Степанов. – Москва: Институт языкознания РАН, 1995. – С. 35-73.

Фуко М. Археология знания. / М.Фукoкиев. Ника - сентр, 2006. – 418 с.

Dunbar R.J.M. Grooming, Gossip, and the Evolution of Language. Current Anthropology. 34:2. – 1993. – P. 69-79.

Seabright P. The Company of Strangers: A Natural History of Economic life. – Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004. – 261 p.

Keeley H.L. War before Civilization: The Myth of the Peaceful Savage. – Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1996. – P. 57-73.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-05

How to Cite

Kuldasheva, S. A., & Ochilova, V. R. (2026). The Problem Of Models Of Discourse In Linguistics. TLEP – International Journal of Multidiscipline, 3(2), 52-55. https://tlepub.org/index.php/1/article/view/747