Cross-Cultural Euphemistic Strategies In Political Discourse: A Comparative Linguopragmatic Analysis Of English And Uzbek Languages
Keywords:
Euphemism, political discourse, English, Uzbek, linguopragmatics, politeness theory, cognitive linguistics, discourse analysis, cross-cultural communication, ideological framing.Abstract
This study explores euphemistic strategies in English and Uzbek political speeches, focusing on their linguopragmatic functions within distinct cultural and typological contexts. It examines how euphemisms, as strategic and ideological tools, shape political discourse, mitigate sensitive topics, and reflect broader socio-cultural values. Drawing on politeness theory, cognitive linguistics, and discourse analysis, the research compares the forms and functions of euphemisms in both languages, highlighting their role in political manipulation, public perception management, and ideological framing. The findings reveal how linguistic and cultural factors influence euphemistic expression and its impact on political communication.
References
Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (1991). Euphemism and dysphemism: Language used as shield and weapon. Oxford University Press.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage (Vol. 4). Cambridge University Press.
Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. Routledge.
Crespo-Fernández, E. (2007). The language of death: Euphemism and conceptual metaphorization in Victorian obituaries. Sky Journal of Linguistics, 20, 7–30.
Fairclough, N. (2006). Language and globalization. Routledge.
Kussmaul, P. (1997). Text type and culture constraints in translation. In A. Trosborg (Ed.), Text typology and translation (pp. 115–126). John Benjamins.
Lakoff, R. (1973). The logic of politeness; or, minding your p's and q's. In C. Corum, T. C. Smith-Stark, & A. Weiser (Eds.), Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 292–305). Chicago Linguistic Society.
Rahmonova, N. (2025). A linguopragmatic comparative analysis of euphemism in English and Uzbek political discourse (Unpublished manuscript).
Sharafutdinov Nodir Sultanovich. (2024). HISTORY OF LINGUOPRAGMATICS STUDY. Kokand University Research Base, 9–15
Sharafutdinov Nodir Sultanovich. (2024). STAGES OF LEARNING LINGUOPRAGMATICS. Kokand University Research Base, 239–245.
